When Guterres forgets his mission

The UN Secretary-General has attempted to paint a negative picture of the nuclear activities of the Islamic Republic of Iran in his recent speeches. In light of this, Antonio Guterres has urged our nation to resolve the persistent worries regarding its nuclear operations and begin the process of "confidence building." Two fundamental points must be taken into account:
First, Guterres refused to take any operational and deterrent action to contain Tel Aviv during the brutal killing and open genocide of the occupying regime of Jerusalem, supported by the US and the European Union, in the Gaza Strip, and his formal and repeated statements have led to the anger of world public opinion.
The UN Secretary-General is making remarks about a phony crisis against the Islamic Republic of Iran while being accused of remaining silent and indifferent to the tens of thousands of women and children being killed in the Gaza Strip. These conflicts and contradictions make it abundantly evident that the UN has evolved into a crisis-making organization that supports the global trend of oppression and dominance rather than serving as the focal point for actual crisis resolution in the international system.
Second, rather than criticizing the Islamic Republic of Iran and suggesting that our nation initiate nuclear talks, Guterres ought to respond to this crucial query: what steps has his organization taken to safeguard the JCPOA and UN Security Council Resolution 2231? Does Guterres really not know that the United States officially withdrew from the nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018 and has implemented the cruel sanctions that should have been lifted according to the JCPOA document as part of a maximum pressure strategy against our country?
The answer to this question is clear! Like Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, instead of protecting the legitimate rights of the members of the community of nations, Guterres is engaged in a self-willed and deliberate game in the puzzle that Washington and Tel Aviv have set for him.
Guterres speaks of confidence-building by Iran, without making the slightest comment on the source and place of creation and production of the current crisis over the JCPOA and UN Security Council Resolution 2231. Without a doubt, such positions make the position of the United Nations and its Secretary-General even more odious than before among those who are impartially monitoring the positions of this organization.
Guterres would be better off considering responsibility for his organization's and his own complete inefficiency in the face of international crises, such as the Gaza and Lebanon issues, rather than using rhetoric against Iran. As the head of the United Nations, Guterres is now viewed by the global public as an official representative of the United States and Washington's allies rather than a champion of human rights and world peace. Instead of correcting his unjustifiable approach to this issue, the UN Secretary-General has preferred to continue his covert and overt consultations with Washington, Tel Aviv, and the European Union in order to at least survive in his position.