Grossi has no place in the sacred territory of Iran

The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reacted to the recent resolution of the Iranian Parliament concerning the suspension of Iran’s cooperation with the Agency, demanding urgent access to the damaged nuclear sites, particularly Fordow and Natanz. Rafael Grossi has claimed:

“Following the recent military confrontations, there is now an opportunity to reassess the Iranian nuclear file. The inspection mechanism at Iran’s nuclear facilities is currently disrupted.”

Two essential points must be considered regarding Grossi’s shameless stance:

First, the suspension of IAEA inspectors’ access to Iran, and even the potential withdrawal of our country from the NPT, does not constitute an “initial act,” but rather a reaction to the insolence and inherent hostility of Grossi and other ineffectual officials within this international body. In clearer terms, the U.S. attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked the end of our voluntary (non-safeguards) cooperation with the IAEA. Under such conditions, there is no logical reason for IAEA inspectors to remain present in Iran. Furthermore, solid evidence has recently emerged indicating Grossi’s and the IAEA inspectors’ security and intelligence cooperation with the Mossad, the Zionist regime’s intelligence agency—evidence that validates the recent decision by the Iranian Parliament.

Second, Grossi’s call for IAEA inspectors to visit the damaged sites in Iran is certainly not driven by a desire to remedy the damage or to condemn the attacks. If the Director General had such intentions, he should have expressed them at the time of the initial Israeli aggression, when our nuclear scientists were martyred, and the Natanz and Fordow sites were violated. Undoubtedly, Grossi and the IAEA’s true aim at this critical juncture is to precisely assess the extent of damage to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure—and, subsequently, to gain access to classified information regarding the hidden locations of enriched uranium stockpiles, particularly those enriched to 60%.

It is only logical that both these matters must remain “unknowns” or “unresolved elements” in Grossi’s mind, as he plays the role of a pawn in the strategic game of Netanyahu and Trump against our country. Grossi is not a neutral international figure in this confrontation—he is an operative advancing the interests of the United States and the Zionist regime. There should be no other view of this anti-Iranian agent.